Archive for the ‘Technique’ Category
Thursday, May 13th, 2010
Confusion Circling Pedaling Technique – Part 1
Efficiency? The Metabolic and Mechanical Considerations
Many times, discussions about pedaling technique start with “what is most efficient”. Depending on who you are speaking with or what research you are viewing, efficiency can be defined differently.
Metabolic Efficiency
To an exercise physiologist, efficiency is defined as the cost for the amount of work performed. The cost is often measured in METs (the metabolic equivalent). This is a measurement of the energy demands of exercise. The work is measured as power (or watts / joules). Using an ergometer (bike) and metabolic testing equipment, we can determine how much energy it takes to do a certain amount of work.
Piston vs. Smooth/Circular Pedaling
Numerous debates are still going on concerning which is most efficient: (1) solely pushing down (piston) or (2) pulling up, over, down and back (circular). Research has shown that there is little to no difference in energy cost with either pedaling style (when riders are setup correctly and using proper form).
Does this make sense?
Absolutely. Plainly speaking, pushing down on the pedals uses your glutes (butt) and quadriceps muscles. The rest of the pedal stroke uses the hamstrings (pulling back), hip flexors (pulling up) and calves (stabilizers). Whether you are using predominantly one set of muscles or spreading the work over multiple muscles is going to require the same amount of overall energy (More on muscle usage in Part 2).
Here is a grossly simplified example:
If you use 100% Quadriceps vs. 70% Quadriceps / 30% Hip Flexors, the total is still going to equal 100%. The energy cost is going to be the same. The body just uses a little less of one muscle and supplements another.
Since there is no difference in the energy requirement, one could conclude that their is no benefit to one pedaling style over another. But is metabolic efficiency the best or only way to determine this? Are there other considerations? The answer is yes. Read on.
|
A Quick Note on “Circular” or “Smooth” Pedaling Technique
Smooth or circular pedaling technique is often confused with trying to apply the same or consistent amount of force around the entire pedal stroke (360 degrees). A brief glance at the different sizes and strengths of the leg muscles that propel the pedals (glutes, quads, calves, hamstrings and hip flexors) should indicate that this is virtually impossible. For example, the hamstrings would be hard pressed to attempt to generate the same amount of power during the bottom of the pedal stroke as the quads can produce on the down-stroke. So what is a smooth pedal stroke referring to?
A smooth pedal stroke refers to the “smooth” transition between the different quadrants (down, back, up and top). Muscles are engaging at various strengths throughout the 360 degrees to maintain a fluid “circular” movement.
|
Mechanical Efficiency
Biomechanists and Kinesiologists look at efficiency through another lens. They are concerned with the mechanical movement and the forces that are being applied to joints and muscles. The physiologist will say “it doesn’t have to look pretty, it just has to be metabolically efficient”. The biomechanist and kinesiologist cringe at someone bouncing, mashing and muscling a bike in an attempt to produce power because they understand that the muscles and joints are being abused in the process.
A piston style of pedaling will place all of the force of the pedal stroke on the knee during the down-stroke. Since no other muscles are being used with this style of pedaling, all of the force needs to be generated during the down-stroke. This places a considerable amount of stress on the knees, more specifically, the patella tendon/ligament. Now if you consider that you will pedal an average of 10,000 rotations per hour, that is quite a bit of concentrated stress on the joint, connective tissues and muscles that act at the knee.
This touches on an issue biomechanists and kinesiologists have with current research: Most, if not all, of the studies that were conducted only required cyclists to ride at high intensities for less than an hour. The effects of mechanical inefficiency generally occur when attempting to maintain moderate to high intensity beyond an hour. These effects would impact endurance, fatigue and the ability to sustain consistent power output. Since cycling is an endurance sport, and many of us ride longer than an hour most of the time, the current research is not replicating the true demands of our sport. Additionally, the longterm effects of mechanical inefficiency can lead to over-use injuries due to the repetitive stress on the knee joint (more on this in Part 8).
|
Going Deep If You’re Not Accelerating, You’re Decelerating
Force needs to be applied to produce velocity. This is the force-velocity relationship. If you only push down on the pedals (piston), force will only be applied to the down-stoke. Thus, the bike will only be accelerating (increasing velocity) during the down-stroke. So what is happening during the top and bottom of the pedal stroke? Well, applying Newton’s second law, without force, the bike will be decelerating at the top and bottom of the pedal stroke. Now we know that the physiologists have proved there is little to no difference in energy needed to pedal using a piston vs. circular technique, so why is this significant?
Hold on to your seats…we’re going in… Leg muscle contraction when pedaling is concentric. Basically, the muscles shorten to move the bones (levers) that move the pedals. On the contrary, an eccentric contraction occurs when the muscle resists force (or the movement of the bones) causing the muscles to lengthen. If you only push down on the pedals, the bike will be decelerating at the top and bottom of the stroke. This means you will be pushing against a pedal that is decelerating. Your muscles will have to resist and reverse this deceleration to re-accelerate the pedals again. Remember, 10,000 rotations per hour. Those thousands of eccentric contractions will place additional stress on the muscles causing fatigue.
Circular pedaling technique maintains force around the entire pedal stroke which reduces the fatiguing effects of repetitive eccentric contractions due to deceleration (re-acceleration).
|
In Summary
Efficiency may not be the best method (or term) to use when trying to examine the benefits of piston vs. circular/smooth pedaling style. There are metabolic and mechanical factors that need to be considered. Cutting-edge research is looking into the neurological stress on the body during exercise. It will be interesting to see how new discoveries in this area enlighten our current understanding of how the body works and responds to the stress of exercise.
Next we will dive deeper into which muscles power which part of the pedal stroke. We will also consider whether using a certain muscle or muscle group is effective or ineffective in generating power.
Posted in Articles and News, Bike Fitting - Biomechanics, Indoor Cycling, Technique, Training Concepts | No Comments »
Friday, May 7th, 2010
Confusion Circling Pedaling Technique – Introduction
As a coach and educator, the issue of pedaling technique comes up quite a bit. I’ve been participating in a number of forums of cycling enthusiasts, instructors and sports scientists and the topic of “proper” or “efficient” pedal stoke is still being heavily debated. What I’ve found is that most of what is being presented is correct. Even when there are opposing arguments. How can this be? There are the physiologists, the biomechanists, cycling coaches, indoor cycling instructors and strength and conditioning coaches all contributing to the theories and referring to various research. After a number of weeks of frustration, attempting to participate and sift through the myriad of seeming controversy, I stumbled on the issue. The variables and applications surrounding pedal stoke are so plentiful that it is difficult to explain all of the aspects of the technique in a simple statement or even a short paragraph. I found myself plunging into verbose responses trying to explain and simplify the concepts. The short, simple responses given by others would be correct within a single application, but would be incorrect when attempted to define the entire realm of pedaling biomechanics.
As the saying goes “More often, the simpler we make a complex topic, the more incorrect we become”.
So where do we go from here? The goal of this multi-part article is to present the numerous issues and applications of pedaling dynamics in context. Hopefully, this will allow us to understand ALL of the elements that contribute to this vast topic. We will also put some definition to various terms so we are all speaking the same language. As coaches, instructors and cyclists, we will be able to confidently approach our training and teaching with a well-rounded (pun not intended), holistic approach to the topic.
Here is what we will cover:
- Part 1: Efficiency? The Metabolic and Mechanical Considerations
- Part 2: Which Muscles and When are they Effective
- Part 3: What are these variables you speak of?
- Part 4: In Context – Does this only apply for Racers?
- Part 5: In Context – Climbing (Seated and Standing)
- Part 6: In Context – Explosive & Sustained Power
- Part 7: In Context – Special Applications (e.g. Track Cycling)
- Part 8: From the Lab: Over-use Injuries and Rehabilitation
- Part 9: Is There a Benefit to Developing Pedal Technique and Leg Speed
- Part 10: Finally, What Should We Teach?
Our goal is to present this complex topic in small, digestible chunks. Considering the need for this information and the confusion surrounding the topic, we will attempt to post all of the parts of this article within the next 2-3 weeks. That is the goal anyway. Please feel free to contact us if you have questions or comments. These are deeply appreciated.
Posted in Articles and News, Bike Fitting - Biomechanics, Indoor Cycling, Technique, Training Concepts | No Comments »
Friday, April 16th, 2010
Indoor Cycling Instructor Workshop
|
$275.00 Workbook Included

|
Saturday / Sunday, July 10-11, 2010 (9:00 – 5:30 PM)
Breathe Denver
2033 East Colfax Avenue
Denver, CO
14 Hours (1.2 ACE, 12.0 AFAA, 1.0 USAC, 14.0 S5C CECs)
Do you qualify for a Instructor Scholarship? Learn More
The Most Comprehensive Indoor Cycling Workshop Available.
Stage5 Cycling has defined the standard of excellence for indoor cycling in the health and fitness industry. We provide the necessary knowledge and training that allow instructors to create dynamic programs and workouts based on proven cycling-specific techniques and skills.
We expect indoor cycling instructors to obtain the same foundational knowledge, such as anatomy, kinesiology, physiology, program design and safety guidelines, required of other fitness professionals at your health club. ( Learn More )
Posted in Indoor Cycling, Technique, Training, Workshops | Comments Off
Saturday, April 10th, 2010
RPMx Audio Profile
Jennifer Sage loved this class and all but demanded that Tom provide it as an Audio PROfile for our ICI/PRO Members.
RPMx is designed to help riders adapt to higher legs speeds and promote a higher average cadence. The intensities will range depending on how developed a rider’s pedal technique is and how relaxed they remain throughout the drills. Riders with good pedal technique, who remain relaxed, will be able to maintain the various cadences at a lower perceived effort. Complete RPMx PROfile here.
Here is the link to ICI/Pro (Subscription Required):
www.indoorcycleinstructor.com/icipro/audio-profiles/icipro-podcast-95-rpmx-audio-profile-with-tom-scotto-from-stage-5-cycling/
Jennifer’s comment:
I listened to this audio PROfile today, and it was almost like I was there again! Ouch. He’s not kidding when he says that last drill is brutal! But it’s a good brutal, and a practical one that teaches you something about your ability to relax, to control, and of course, to turn those pedals quickly. It’s about your neuromuscular ability, which is fortunately something that everyone can improve with some focused training. It you can’t do it very well now, then it simply reveals you that you need some work in this area.
The great thing about this audio PROfile is that even if you don’t feel like you have the confidence to teach a full profile of just cadence work (yet), then there are some cueing and coaching gems in here that you can apply to other profiles in which you want your students to focus on leg speed even just for a song or two.
This one will help you take your teaching to the next level! Thank you Tom for adding a fantastic resource for our ICI/PRO members.
Posted in Articles and News, Indoor Cycling, Technique, Training, Training Concepts | No Comments »
Tuesday, March 30th, 2010
Jennifer Sage Visits Stage5 Cycling
[The following is from Jennifer Sage's post at ICI/Pro on March 24, 2010.]
I spent this past weekend in Boston and Vermont. Thankfully the previous week’s deluge had passed and I was blessed with great weather. I headed east for several reasons, one of which was to meet with Tom Scotto of Stage5 Cycling to learn more about his certification program and how I (and ICI) can get more involved. I also went out to be a part of the instructor team for the 6-hour Ride for a Reason fundraiser in Burlington, Vermont on Sunday. That was a fantastic experience, but I’ll write about that in another post.
I had the great fortune of taking one of Tom’s classes. He teaches at multiple facilities; this one was at Fitcorp at the Harvard Medical Center. I have to say that it was one of the most cycling specific classes I have ever personally taken, one of two classes actually. Yes, in 13 years of taking Spinning classes, even at WSSC, I’ve not experienced a class quite like it, not from Josh Taylor, not from Johnny G, not from any “Spinning” instructor. The other one was a class (not a Spinning® class) I took 10 years ago from Dave Scott, elite triathlete and coach and 6-time Ironman world champion. But Tom’s class was amazing in every way – he has a unique skill of coaching that transcends almost anyone I’ve ever heard.
Read the rest of this post at www.indoorcycleinstructor.com/indoor-cycling-20/cycling-specific-class-review-stage5-cycling-class/#more-4830.
Posted in Articles and News, Indoor Cycling, Technique, Training | No Comments »
Saturday, January 16th, 2010
Workshop – Developing Explosive Power
Sunday, March 7, 2010, 11:30 – 1:30 PM
Ten X Club
1400 Worcester, Natick, MA 01760
Call The New England Fitness Company at (774) 696-2552 for availability.
Producing an explosive effort on the bike is much more than pure strength.
Learn the proper biomechanics that promote safety and maximize extended power. Experience maximum intensity as you tap into your body’s most powerful energy sources!
Includes a 45-minute ride that samples different types of sprints and how to construct a class focused on generating explosive power.
Class is led by USA Cycling Coach, Tom Scotto, who will take you beyond learning to personal experience. This is a perfect workshop to help your riders understand the benefits and limitations of sprints and power work on an indoor bike.
Heart rate monitors are strongly recommended to get the full benefit of the workshop.
Posted in Indoor Cycling, Technique, Training, Workshops | Comments Off
Wednesday, September 9th, 2009
How to Safely Launch a Sprint on an Indoor Bike
As Jennifer Sage (IndoorCyclingInstructor.com) and I were discussing Jumps and the safety and movement of the body, another discussion started concerning sprinting in the indoor studio. Here is Jennifer’s questions that prompted this dialog and article:
“With the lack of side to side movement in the indoor bike, you wouldn’t condone the same relative side to side movement of the body when someone is sprinting indoors?”
[To Jennifer] Well I again agree with you 100%. The art and technique of sprinting has been utterly destroyed in the indoor studio. This is the main reason why I DO teach it. It is funny that you brought this up because I just finished a week of Explosive Power sessions with the riders in all my clubs. It is a total eye-opener for them. I teach them the form, the target energy system (ATP PC) and strategies for executing various types of sprints. We spend quite a bit on the importance of recovery and how to use it as an indicator of proper intensity and recognizing signs that the body can continue or is too fatigued. I use a bunch of cool teaching aids and analogies that make it fun and interesting for the non-cyclists (80% of the class). I’m always surprised that people tell me afterwards that it is one of the best classes they have every taken.
Here is the basic outline of the class which I think will do a better job of answering some of the questions you had in your email. I’ve taken extra time to write this because I know you are a great instructor that not only understands this stuff but appreciates it.
WARM-UP
We perform a gradual / progressive warm-up for approx 15min. The ride starts on a flat road and then progresses to a rolling terrain to allow riders to come out of the saddle on a few of the hills and continue to raise their heart rate to a RPE of 75-80%. We talk through the workout and issue warnings for anyone who may be dealing with injuries (knees, back, neck, etc.). Everyone is always encouraged to work at their own pace (fitness level) and remember that FORM always comes first. If you can’t maintain good form, you should not maintain the intensity.
FORM SPRINTS
Just like on the road. We perform 4-6 sprints at an 80% effort. We discuss the limitation of the indoor bike. I give them a formula for executing the sprint which we practice. Here is the formula: As I count down (4…3…2…1…) the riders are adding the necessary resistance for the sprint. Once they have added the resistance they come out of the saddle THEN the sprint starts. Coming out of the saddle before sprinting compensates for the lack of fore-aft movement of the indoor bike and takes pressure off the lumbar spine.
During the form sprints the riders are encouraged to experiment with different amounts of resistance and various leg speeds (I recommend UNDER 100rpm). They MUST be in control at all times. I also give them instruction on proper use of the toe cages. I’ve seen riders slip out of their pedals many times. So many people don’t know how to proper adjust and position their foot in the cages. A pet peeve of mine.
We also cover movement of the body (side to side) when out of the saddle. I encourage riders to move their body naturally side to side. This is always a training issue because you don’t want people swinging back and forth too much. Certainly NO WHERE NEAR the movement in that photo I sent you of Tom Boonen. On an indoor bike, I find a rider can move approximately 2-4 inches in either direction. This applies to ANY out of the saddle effort. We work on this during our form sprints. Riders are given 1 minute between form sprints to recovery.
If a rider does NOT move their body out of the saddle (and even in the saddle – I’ll address this later), additional stress will be placed on the neck, shoulders, arms, back and chest. Besides hindering their biomechanics, this lack of movement (that may people incorrectly think is proper form) will fatigue the upper body muscles, waste energy (the muscles need fuel to contract), waste oxygen (fuel requires oxygen to burn) and can even restrict breathing (tight muscles wrap and place pressure on the rib cage hindering expansion and movement restricting lung capacity). Most people are total convinced after that speech. I encourage people to remain as relaxed as possible. Tight muscles hinder joints which hinder movement. Not good. We also deal with issues of leaning too far forward or backwards.
GENERAL PURPOSE SPRINTS
After the form sprints, we recover for 3-4 minutes and prepare to sprint for real. Riders are encourage to continue to work on their form, amount of resistance and leg speed and learn as they go. We will recover 2 minutes between each 15sec sprint and then recover another 4 minutes after a set of 4 sprints. I EMPHASIS THE RECOVERY after the set. We are dealing with extremes…..Extreme Effort…..Extreme Recovery. You can’t have one without the other. Ironically, the recovery is there to make the ride HARDER. Since they know I will give them time to fully recovery, they are now free to give all they’ve got without the fear of having to sprint again too quickly. I remind them that when I’m coaching a rider or team on the road, we will recover for 4-6 MINUTES between sprints. We make a slight adaption for the indoor studio. Rider are also encourage to SKIP a sprint if they are not recovered enough and then jump back in when ready. This is one of the issues I see, when instructors without cycling knowledge, attempt to do sprints in their classes. They don’t teach form (or correctly) and have little concept of the body’s physiological thresholds and capacity. They will have riders sprinting every 15 seconds. After the first sprint, riders are just flailing at the pedals aimlessly (with terrible form).
CRITERIUM AND HILL SPRINTS
After the appropriate recovery, we will perform 2 more sets of sprints. Next up are Criterium sprints which are 30 seconds long. I again give riders a formula for executing a successful 30 SECOND sprint. After the usual countdown and first coming out of the saddle, riders do the following: (1) Ramp up speed for the first 10 seconds, (2) maintain 95% intensity for 10 seconds and (3) pull the trigger and go all out for the final 10 seconds. This is to help them make use of the ATP PC system which only has 6-10 seconds of go juice. I want them to hit the finish line at full tilt and not start out at full tilt and fade at the line. I give them the visual that we are approach a left hand turn as I count down (4…3…2…1). They are adding the necessary resistance as they approach the turn. They then come out of the saddle and sprint down the final straight-a-way. If someone has never sprinted for 30-seconds before, it is quite an education and I warn them of such.
HILL SPRINTS
We conclude this particular workout with a 7-minute climb on which they will sprint the last 15-seconds of each minute. There is no real recovery since we are still maintaining the climb between sprints (different than hill repeats). To keep it interesting, we alternate climbing in and out of the saddle, one minute at a time. This gives them an opportunity to sprint or accelerate standing or seated. Here is where I emphasis upper body movement when riding IN THE SADDLE. Again, people incorrectly believe that the body should remain still. I prefer the term “quiet”. There should be some movement (but not 4 inches). Riders that do not rider outdoors are not aware that the bike will rock slightly side to side when they are seated and applying greater force to the pedals. We just don’t often notice it because our body is actually not moving – the bike is. The same issues will apply as when trying to remain still out of the saddle. The movement should be natural and the rider needs to remain relaxed. This is why I love coaching. I love enhancing their riding experience, helping them achieve better performance and a safer more natural ride.
Posted in Articles and News, Indoor Cycling, Technique | No Comments »
Friday, September 4th, 2009
Jumping in the Indoor Studio
Recently I responded to an article by Jennifer Sage on IndoorCyclingInstructor.com entitled “To Jump or Not to Jump: That is the question”. We joined in to add a USA Cycling coach’s perspective taking into consideration some of the limitations of the indoor bike, safety and purpose.
You can read Jennifer Sage’s original article at www.indoorcyclinginstructor.com to see how the discussion started.
Just to be clear, we are solely referring to indoor cycling jumps and not jumps familiar to cyclists that train outdoors.
In summary, jumps (as Spinning and Schwinn) define them, should never be done on an indoor bike. There are some dangers and misconceptions that can help instructors understand why this is not an appropriate technique.
Let me start by saying, as a USA Cycling coach, my perspective is very real-cycling focused. Regardless, I’m not a big fan of distinguishing between and indoor (non-cyclist) and a outdoor cyclist, both of whom may take an indoor cycling class. Both are riding a bike which require similar biomechanics and technique with a few adaptations (I’ll explain below). The determining factor is the workout. A well defined, appropriate and purposeful workout (with good music) will please any crowd regardless of age, fitness or skill level.
I am in agreement with Jennifer Sage’s definition of “real” cycling jumps. Dead on. My issue lies with the non-cycling (Spinning, etc.) jumps.
Why NON-Cycling Jumps are potentially Dangers
(1) Strain to the lower back (lumbar spine). When a rider stands on a real bike, the bike moves backwards under the rider approximately 3-6 inches. The better the rider’s technique, the least movement. You may have noticed this when riding close to a someone’s back wheel. They stand to climb or accelerate and now your front wheel is hitting or overlapping their rear wheel (hopefully the later). THE PROBLEM: Indoor bikes don’t move. When an rider stands too quickly or forcefully on an indoor bike, stress is placed on the lower back and spine because the force and momentum of the pedals thrusts them forward. When sprinting or accelerating out of the saddle on an indoor bike, riders should be instructed to smoothly come up out of the saddle with the appropriate resistance BEFORE launching their effort to reduce the force on the lower back.
(2) The Bike Doesn’t Move (Part 2). Because bikes don’t move SIDE to SIDE, a rider can potentially stress hip and knee joints and strain upper body muscle without proper technique. When a rider stands and pedals on a real bike, the bike gently (and sometimes, not so gently) sways/rocks side to side underneath the rider. This is proper technique and done to achieve better mechanics between the legs and bike. If a rider stands and tries to keep the bike from moving side to side, this will cause the upper body muscles (shoulders, back, neck, biceps, chest, forearms, etc.) to contract against the force. This unnecessary muscle contraction wastes energy (fuel), uses oxygen, fatigues the muscles and, more importantly can strain the muscles. Similarly, if a rider tries to stand and keep the bike still, the mechanics of the legs will be hindered placing stress on the hips, knees and sometimes the ankles and feet.
With that said (whew…), non-cycling jumps are too fast a movement to compensate for the NON-MOVEMENT of the indoor bike. In addition, it is more difficult to monitor a larger indoor cycling class to ensure everyone is fit correctly to the bike and is using proper form and technique.
It Doesn’t Teach Real (Functional) Technique
I appreciate Jennifer’s comment on using non-cycling jumps as a drill to improve technique. Her examples of a tennis player, soccer player and volleyball player are correct. However, this does not translate to cycling for one reason – The Bike Doesn’t Move. The tennis, soccer and volleyball players are using the same equipment and functional movement required of their sport. The movement on the indoor bike is not “functional” for the purpose of non-cycling jumps because the static nature of the bike does not promote proper, movement, reaction and bike handling out of the saddle. If you are still not convinced, go outside on your real bike and do a few sets of 2 second jumps (wear a helmet).
MISCONCEPTION: Standing on the Bike.
Riders in general (indoors and out) have a misconception about riding out of the saddle. I’ve encouraged my indoor riders to watch at least one stage of the Tour de France this year and observe how often riders stand. One will notice that riders not only stand on climbs and to sprint and accelerate, but they stand on flat roads and at lower intensities as well. I’m not going to get into the different standing techniques, but let’s just say riders should be standing way more often than they do. One reason riders will stand is to stretch the legs (they will often do this on flat sections of road). It allows the leg (which cannot not fully extend seated) to elongate and stretch the muscles keeping them from shortening from multiple contractions. This year I coached a training camp with Tour de France rider, Fred Morini (Gerolsteiner). He spent a good amount of time getting riders out of the saddle and teaching them stretching techniques. I was even challenged to get out of the saddle more (and I thought I stood a lot).
This can be a tough concept to explain, even to outdoor riders (and instructors) because they are not often spending enough time out of the saddle themselves. This needs to be incorporated in drills and recovery.
MISCONCEPTION: We Need Variety
We don’t need variety as much as we need real training. We (Stage5) have over 40 different indoor workouts. Each with its own focus (training effect), specific drills, music and charts. There is no mystery or magic here. We are simply adapting outdoor workouts to the indoor cycling studio. The workouts are designed to target different skill and fitness levels and are appropriate to the time of year (periodization). Our riders will often not get the same workout more than once in a 2-month period. Rides can vary from focused training sessions (aerobic development, speed-biomechanics, muscular endurance, explosive power, threshold, etc.), rides (rolling terrain and famous routes), to race day events (Tour de France, local races and the like). If an instructor does their homework and understands how to lead their riders through the training session, ride or event, they will please and motivate any rider, any age, skill or fitness level. That is the beauty of indoor cycling.
Sooooooooooo, that is my $0.02 (or maybe $0.10).
Posted in Indoor Cycling, Technique | No Comments »
|
latest news / Articles ( More )
Wednesday, August 31st, 2011
Make it Real. Make it Last.
Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011
“Virtually” Riding
Friday, August 5th, 2011
1-Legged Drills
|